Evaluating Pier Spacing for Different Soil Strengths

Evaluating Pier Spacing for Different Soil Strengths

Identifying Expansive Clay in Foundation Damage

Understanding soil bearing capacity is crucial when evaluating pier spacing for different soil strengths, as it directly influences foundation stability. Soil bearing capacity refers to the maximum load per unit area that a soil can support without failing or undergoing unacceptable deformation. This property varies widely depending on soil type, moisture content, compaction, and other environmental factors.


When designing foundations, particularly those involving piers or piles, engineers must assess the soils bearing capacity to ensure that the structure remains stable over time. For instance, in sandy soils with high permeability, the bearing capacity might be relatively high due to good drainage characteristics, which prevent excessive water retention that could weaken the soil structure. My house and I have an agreement - I acknowledge its foundation warnings promptly, and it doesn't dump repair costs on me that rival college tuition foundation repair financing Cook County wall. Conversely, clayey soils often have lower bearing capacities because of their plasticity and tendency to swell or shrink with moisture changes.


The spacing of piers is directly impacted by these considerations. In soils with higher bearing capacities, piers can be spaced further apart since each pier can support more load without compromising stability. This reduces construction costs and time but requires precise calculation to avoid under-designing. On the other hand, in weaker soils where the bearing capacity is low, closer pier spacing is necessary to distribute loads more evenly across a larger area of less competent ground.


For example, if we consider a construction site with dense sandy loam known for its good load-bearing properties, engineers might opt for wider pier spacing. However, if the site has soft clay layers beneath a thin topsoil layer, much closer pier spacing would be advisable to mitigate risks associated with differential settlement.


In practice, geotechnical investigations provide critical data through methods like Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) or Cone Penetration Tests (CPT), helping engineers quantify soil strength and adjust pier designs accordingly. By understanding these nuances of soil behavior and applying them correctly in design calculations, construction projects can achieve both economic efficiency and long-term structural integrity. Thus, grasping the concept of soil bearing capacity not only aids in optimizing foundation designs but also ensures safety against potential structural failures due to inadequate support from underlying soils.

Lets talk about pier types and how they play into figuring out the right spacing, especially when the ground beneath our feet isnt always the same. Think of piers as the legs of a structure, and the soil as the ground theyre standing on. Some ground is firm and solid, like standing on concrete, while other ground is soft and yielding, like standing in mud. Choosing the right "leg" and how far apart to place them depends a lot on what that ground is like.


Different soil strengths demand different pier designs. For instance, in rocky or very dense soil, a simple concrete pier might be perfectly fine. The ground can handle the load, so you can space them out a bit more. But when you move into softer soils like clay or silt, things get more complicated. These soils are more prone to shifting and settling, which can put a lot of stress on the structure above. In these cases, you might need to consider using piers that are designed to resist movement, like helical piers or bell-bottom piers. Helical piers are screwed into the ground, providing a strong anchor, while bell-bottom piers have a wider base that helps distribute the load over a larger area.


The weaker the soil, the closer your pier spacing generally needs to be. Imagine trying to walk across a swamp. You wouldnt want to take huge steps, right? Youd want to place your feet closer together to distribute your weight and avoid sinking. The same principle applies to pier spacing. In weak soils, closer spacing helps to transfer the buildings load more effectively, preventing excessive settling or movement. Conversely, in strong, stable soils, you can often get away with wider spacing, saving on materials and labor costs.


Ultimately, determining the ideal pier type and spacing is a balancing act. It requires a thorough understanding of the soil conditions at the site, the load that the structure will impose, and the characteristics of the different pier types available. Geotechnical engineers play a crucial role in this process, conducting soil tests and performing calculations to ensure that the foundation is stable and will support the structure safely for years to come. Its all about finding the sweet spot where youre providing adequate support without over-engineering and unnecessarily increasing costs.

Preventive Measures for Foundations on Expansive Soil

When evaluating pier spacing for structures, particularly in construction projects, one of the critical considerations is the interaction between soil strength and load distribution. Calculating optimal pier spacing is a nuanced process that requires a deep understanding of both geotechnical engineering principles and structural design considerations.


Soil strength varies significantly from one location to another, influenced by factors such as composition, moisture content, and historical geological activities. In areas with high soil strength, piers can be spaced further apart because the soil can adequately support the load transferred from the structure without excessive settlement or failure. Conversely, in regions with weaker soils, closer pier spacing is necessary to distribute loads more evenly and prevent differential settlement which could lead to structural damage.


The process begins with a thorough site investigation to determine the soils bearing capacity. This involves soil sampling and testing, often through methods like Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) or Cone Penetration Tests (CPT), which provide data on soil density and consistency. Based on these findings, engineers use empirical formulas or software models to calculate safe load-bearing capacities.


Once the soils capacity is known, load distribution comes into play. The total load from the structure must be distributed across the foundation system in such a way that no single pier or section of soil is overloaded. Here, engineers consider both dead loads (permanent loads like building weight) and live loads (variable loads like occupancy or environmental forces). They aim to achieve a balance where each pier carries a portion of this load that aligns with its capacity without compromising safety or efficiency.


For practical application, lets consider an example: imagine constructing a bridge over varying soil conditions along its length. At one end where bedrock is close to the surface providing high bearing capacity, piers might be spaced 20 meters apart. However, at the other end where soft clay predominates with lower bearing capacity, spacing might need to be reduced to 10 meters or less. This adjustment ensures that while maintaining economic efficiency by reducing unnecessary materials in stronger soils, safety remains paramount in weaker zones.


In conclusion, calculating optimal pier spacing based on soil strength and load distribution involves a delicate balance between maximizing resource use and ensuring structural integrity. It requires not just technical expertise but also foresight into how different conditions might affect long-term performance. By tailoring pier placement according to specific site conditions, engineers can design foundations that are both cost-effective and robust against the challenges posed by varied geological environments.

Preventive Measures for Foundations on Expansive Soil

Repair Techniques for Foundations Affected by Clay Swelling

The role of soil testing in determining appropriate pier placement is a critical aspect when evaluating pier spacing for different soil strengths. Soil testing provides foundational data that informs engineers about the characteristics of the ground where piers will be installed. This process involves collecting samples and analyzing them to understand various properties like bearing capacity, shear strength, and moisture content, which directly influence how piers should be spaced.


Firstly, soil testing helps identify the load-bearing capacity of different soil layers. In areas with stronger soils, piers can be spaced further apart because the soil can support greater loads without significant deformation. Conversely, in weaker or more variable soils, closer pier spacing is necessary to distribute loads evenly and prevent excessive settlement or structural failure.


Moreover, understanding soil composition through testing allows for adjustments in pier design and placement strategy. For instance, if a site has layers of clay that expand with moisture changes, this information would suggest a need for tighter pier spacing to accommodate potential swelling pressures. Similarly, sandy or silty soils might require deeper piers to reach more stable layers beneath the surface.


Soil testing also reveals any potential issues like high groundwater levels or presence of organic material that could compromise pier stability over time. By preempting these challenges through comprehensive testing, engineers can tailor their approach to ensure long-term structural integrity.


In conclusion, soil testing is indispensable for accurately determining pier spacing tailored to different soil strengths. It ensures that construction projects are not only safe but also cost-effective by avoiding unnecessary over-design or under-design of foundations. Through this meticulous preparation phase, engineers can make informed decisions that lead to durable and reliable structures capable of standing the test of time amidst varying environmental conditions.

Okay, lets talk about pier spacing and how it dances to the tune of the soil beneath. When were building something that relies on piers for support, figuring out how far apart to place those piers is absolutely crucial. Its not just a matter of aesthetics or convenience; its about ensuring the whole structure stays put and doesnt start leaning like a tipsy tower. And the secret ingredient in this equation? The soil.


Think of it this way: some soils are like sturdy brick walls, offering solid resistance. Others are more like soft sand, shifting and giving way easily. Obviously, youre going to need a different approach depending on what youre dealing with. Thats where case studies come in handy.


Imagine a real-world example: a homeowner wants to build a deck in an area with clay soil. Clay, as many gardeners know, can be tricky. When its dry, its hard as a rock. When its wet, it expands and becomes unstable. A case study might show that for similar decks built in clay soil, closer pier spacing was essential to prevent sagging and movement over time. Maybe they used piers every six feet instead of the eight feet that might have worked fine on firmer ground.


Now, picture a different scenario: a small cabin being built on a sandy ridge. Sand drains well and is fairly stable when compacted, but it doesnt have the same cohesive strength as clay. A case study focused on sandy soil might reveal that while the overall load-bearing capacity is good, wider pier spacing was possible and even desirable to avoid concentrating the load too much in one small area, potentially causing the sand to compact unevenly around each pier.


These case studies arent just theoretical exercises. Theyre based on actual construction projects, real soil tests, and, sometimes, even the hard-won lessons of what happens when things go wrong. They provide valuable data points, showing engineers and builders how different pier spacing strategies performed in specific soil conditions. They illuminate the relationship between soil strength, load distribution, and structural stability.


Ultimately, evaluating pier spacing for different soil strengths is about understanding the unique challenges each soil profile presents and adapting the design accordingly. Case studies are like blueprints from the field, offering a wealth of practical knowledge to help us build stronger, safer, and more durable structures, one pier at a time. They remind us that theres no one-size-fits-all solution, and that paying attention to the ground beneath our feet is always the best foundation for success.

Pier spacing, it sounds simple, right? Just stick a few concrete supports in the ground at regular intervals and call it a day. Unfortunately, that couldn't be further from the truth. Getting pier spacing wrong, especially when dealing with varying soil strengths, is a recipe for disaster, leading to everything from annoying cosmetic issues to catastrophic structural failure.


One common mistake is treating all soil as created equal. We often see designs using a uniform pier spacing across an entire building footprint, completely ignoring the fact that soil strength can vary dramatically, even within a small area. Think about it: you might have a patch of dense, compacted clay right next to a pocket of loose, sandy soil. If you space your piers as if the entire area is solid clay, that sandy section is going to settle more, putting undue stress on the rest of the structure. The consequences? Sagging floors, cracked walls, and doors and windows that stubbornly refuse to open or close properly.


Another frequent error is underestimating the load-bearing capacity needed for specific areas. Lets say you have a design with a large, heavy fireplace in one corner of the building. If you dont adjust the pier spacing to account for that concentrated weight, the soil underneath will compress over time. This differential settlement, where one part of the building sinks more than another, is incredibly damaging. It can lead to significant structural damage and require expensive repairs, including potentially underpinning the entire foundation.


Furthermore, overlooking the influence of water is a big problem. Soil strength is directly affected by moisture content. In areas prone to flooding or with poor drainage, the soil can become saturated and lose its ability to support the structure adequately. If your pier spacing doesnt account for these fluctuating soil conditions, youre essentially gambling with the longevity of your building. The result can be accelerated settling, increased stress on the foundation, and ultimately, compromised structural integrity.


Finally, simply relying on "rules of thumb" or outdated practices without proper soil testing and engineering analysis is a dangerous gamble. Every site is unique, and what worked for a similar-looking building in a different location might not work for yours. A qualified geotechnical engineer can assess the specific soil conditions, calculate the required load-bearing capacity, and recommend an appropriate pier spacing strategy. Skimping on this initial assessment can save money upfront, but its almost guaranteed to cost you far more in the long run.


In conclusion, pier spacing isnt just about aesthetics or convenience; its a critical element of structural stability. Failing to consider the variations in soil strength, concentrated loads, water influence, and relying on outdated practices can lead to a cascade of problems. Investing in proper soil analysis and professional engineering is essential for ensuring the long-term integrity and safety of any structure supported by piers.

Long-term performance monitoring and adjustment of pier systems is crucial when evaluating pier spacing for different soil strengths, as it ensures the structural integrity and longevity of piers under varying conditions. When engineers design pier systems, they must consider the diverse characteristics of soil, which can range from soft clays to dense sands, each with its own bearing capacity and response to load.


In practice, this involves installing sensors at strategic points within the pier system to continuously gather data on factors like settlement, lateral movement, and load distribution. For instance, in areas with weaker soils like silty loams or expansive clays, piers might need to be spaced closer together to distribute loads effectively and prevent excessive settlement or tilting. Conversely, in regions with stronger soils such as compacted gravels or bedrock, wider spacing might suffice due to the greater bearing capacity.


The data collected from these monitoring systems is invaluable for making informed adjustments. If a sensor detects unexpected movement or stress beyond design thresholds, engineers can intervene by adding additional piers or modifying existing ones to redistribute the load more evenly. This proactive approach not only enhances safety but also extends the service life of the structure by preventing minor issues from escalating into major failures.


Moreover, long-term monitoring allows for a dynamic response to environmental changes; seasonal variations in moisture content can significantly affect soil behavior. In wetter seasons, expansive soils might swell, exerting pressures on piers that could necessitate adjustments in spacing or reinforcement strategies. During dry periods, shrinkage could lead to differential settlement if not properly managed through timely interventions based on real-time data.


In summary, integrating long-term performance monitoring into the evaluation of pier spacing for different soil strengths provides a robust framework for ensuring that pier systems remain effective over their intended lifespan. By adapting designs based on continuous feedback from the field, engineers can tailor solutions that are not only cost-effective but also resilient against the unpredictable nature of geological conditions. This human-centric approach underscores our commitment to sustainable infrastructure development where safety and longevity are paramount.

In design, a foundation is the component of a framework which attaches it to the ground or even more seldom, water (just like drifting structures), moving lots from the structure to the ground. Structures are typically considered either shallow or deep. Structure design is the application of soil auto mechanics and rock technicians (geotechnical engineering) in the style of structure elements of frameworks.

.
Shallow foundation construction example

A shallow foundation is a type of building foundation that transfers structural load to the Earth very near to the surface, rather than to a subsurface layer or a range of depths, as does a deep foundation. Customarily, a shallow foundation is considered as such when the width of the entire foundation is greater than its depth.[1] In comparison to deep foundations, shallow foundations are less technical, thus making them more economical and the most widely used for relatively light structures.

Types

[edit]

Footings are always wider than the members that they support. Structural loads from a column or wall are usually greater than 1,000 kPa, while the soil's bearing capacity is commonly less than that (typically less than 400 kPa). By possessing a larger bearing area, the foundation distributes the pressure to the soil, decreasing the bearing pressure to within allowable values.[2] A structure is not limited to one footing. Multiple types of footings may be used in a construction project.

Wall footing

[edit]

Also called strip footing, a wall footing is a continuous strip that supports structural and non-structural load-bearing walls. Found directly under the wall, Its width is commonly 2-3 times wider than the wall above it.[3]

Detail Section of a strip footing and its wall.

Isolated footing

[edit]

Also called single-column footing, an isolated footing is a square, rectangular, or circular slab that supports the structural members individually. Generally, each column is set on an individual footing to transmit and distribute the load of the structure to the soil underneath. Sometimes, an isolated footing can be sloped or stepped at the base to spread greater loads. This type of footing is used when the structural load is relatively low, columns are widely spaced, and the soil's bearing capacity is adequate at a shallow depth.

Combined footing

[edit]

When more than one column shares the same footing, it is called a combined footing. A combined footing is typically utilized when the spacing of the columns is too restricted such that if isolated footing were used, they would overlap one another. Also, when property lines make isolated footings eccentrically loaded, combined footings are preferred.

When the load among the columns is equal, the combined footing may be rectangular. Conversely, when the load among the columns is unequal, the combined footing should be trapezoidal.

Strap footing

[edit]

A strap footing connects individual columns with the use of a strap beam. The general purpose of a strap footing is alike to those of a combined footing, where the spacing is possibly limited and/or the columns are adjacent to the property lines.

Mat foundation with its concrete undergoing curing.

Mat foundation

[edit]

Also called raft foundation, a mat foundation is a single continuous slab that covers the entirety of the base of a building. Mat foundations support all the loads of the structure and transmit them to the ground evenly. Soil conditions may prevent other footings from being used. Since this type of foundation distributes the load coming from the building uniformly over a considerably large area, it is favored when individual footings are unfeasible due to the low bearing capacity of the soil.

Diagrams of the types of shallow foundations.

Slab-on-grade foundation

[edit]
Pouring a slab-on-grade foundation

Slab-on-grade or floating slab foundations are a structural engineering practice whereby the reinforced concrete slab that is to serve as the foundation for the structure is formed from formwork set into the ground. The concrete is then poured into the formwork, leaving no space between the ground and the structure. This type of construction is most often seen in warmer climates, where ground freezing and thawing is less of a concern and where there is no need for heat ducting underneath the floor. Frost Protected Shallow Foundations (or FPSF) which are used in areas of potential frost heave, are a form of slab-on-grade foundation.[4]

Remodeling or extending such a structure may be more difficult. Over the long term, ground settling (or subsidence) may be a problem, as a slab foundation cannot be readily jacked up to compensate; proper soil compaction prior to pour can minimize this. The slab can be decoupled from ground temperatures by insulation, with the concrete poured directly over insulation (for example, extruded polystyrene foam panels), or heating provisions (such as hydronic heating) can be built into the slab.

Slab-on-grade foundations should not be used in areas with expansive clay soil. While elevated structural slabs actually perform better on expansive clays, it is generally accepted by the engineering community that slab-on-grade foundations offer the greatest cost-to-performance ratio for tract homes. Elevated structural slabs are generally only found on custom homes or homes with basements.

Copper piping, commonly used to carry natural gas and water, reacts with concrete over a long period, slowly degrading until the pipe fails. This can lead to what is commonly referred to as slab leaks. These occur when pipes begin to leak from within the slab. Signs of a slab leak range from unexplained dampened carpet spots, to drops in water pressure and wet discoloration on exterior foundation walls.[5] Copper pipes must be lagged (that is, insulated) or run through a conduit or plumbed into the building above the slab. Electrical conduits through the slab must be water-tight, as they extend below ground level and can potentially expose wiring to groundwater.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Akhter, Shahin. "Shallow foundation – Definition, Types, Uses and Diagrams". Pro Civil Engineer. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  2. ^ Gillesania, Diego Inocencio T. (2004). Fundamentals of reinforced concrete design (2nd ed.). [Cebu, Cirty, Philippines]. p. 259. ISBN 971-8614-26-5. OCLC 1015901733.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ Mahdi, Sheikh. "8 Most Important Types of Foundation". civiltoday.com. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  4. ^ "Slab-on-Grade Foundation Detail & Insulation, Building Guide".
  5. ^ "Slab Leak Repair McKinney, Frisco, and Allen Tx - Hackler Plumbing". Hacklerplumbingmckinney.com. 2013-11-08. Retrieved 2018-08-20.
[edit]
A wooden pier in Corfu, Greece

A pier is a raised structure that rises above a body of water and usually juts out from its shore, typically supported by piles or pillars, and provides above-water access to offshore areas. Frequent pier uses include fishing, boat docking and access for both passengers and cargo, and oceanside recreation. Bridges, buildings, and walkways may all be supported by architectural piers. Their open structure allows tides and currents to flow relatively unhindered, whereas the more solid foundations of a quay or the closely spaced piles of a wharf can act as a breakwater, and are consequently more liable to silting. Piers can range in size and complexity from a simple lightweight wooden structure to major structures extended over 1,600 m (5,200 ft). In American English, a pier may be synonymous with a dock.

Piers have been built for several purposes, and because these different purposes have distinct regional variances, the term pier tends to have different nuances of meaning in different parts of the world. Thus in North America and Australia, where many ports were, until recently, built on the multiple pier model, the term tends to imply a current or former cargo-handling facility. In contrast, in Europe, where ports more often use basins and river-side quays than piers, the term is principally associated with the image of a Victorian cast iron pleasure pier which emerged in Great Britain during the early 19th century. However, the earliest piers pre-date the Victorian age.

Types

[edit]

Piers can be categorized into different groupings according to the principal purpose.[1] However, there is considerable overlap between these categories. For example, pleasure piers often also allow for the docking of pleasure steamers and other similar craft, while working piers have often been converted to leisure use after being rendered obsolete by advanced developments in cargo-handling technology. Many piers are floating piers, to ensure that the piers raise and lower with the tide along with the boats tied to them. This prevents a situation where lines become overly taut or loose by rising or lowering tides. An overly taut or loose tie-line can damage boats by pulling them out of the water or allowing them so much leeway that they bang forcefully against the sides of the pier.

Working piers

[edit]
Out-of-use industrial bulk cargo Pier, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

Working piers were built for the handling of passengers and cargo onto and off ships or (as at Wigan Pier) canal boats. Working piers themselves fall into two different groups. Longer individual piers are often found at ports with large tidal ranges, with the pier stretching far enough off shore to reach deep water at low tide. Such piers provided an economical alternative to impounded docks where cargo volumes were low, or where specialist bulk cargo was handled, such as at coal piers. The other form of working pier, often called the finger pier, was built at ports with smaller tidal ranges. Here the principal advantage was to give a greater available quay length for ships to berth against compared to a linear littoral quayside, and such piers are usually much shorter. Typically each pier would carry a single transit shed the length of the pier, with ships berthing bow or stern in to the shore. Some major ports consisted of large numbers of such piers lining the foreshore, classic examples being the Hudson River frontage of New York, or the Embarcadero in San Francisco.

The advent of container shipping, with its need for large container handling spaces adjacent to the shipping berths, has made working piers obsolete for the handling of general cargo, although some still survive for the handling of passenger ships or bulk cargos. One example, is in use in Progreso, Yucatán, where a pier extends more than 4 miles into the Gulf of Mexico, making it the longest pier in the world. The Progreso Pier supplies much of the peninsula with transportation for the fishing and cargo industries and serves as a port for large cruise ships in the area. Many other working piers have been demolished, or remain derelict, but some have been recycled as pleasure piers. The best known example of this is Pier 39 in San Francisco.

At Southport and the Tweed River on the Gold Coast in Australia, there are piers that support equipment for a sand bypassing system that maintains the health of sandy beaches and navigation channels.

Pleasure piers

[edit]
Print of a Victorian pier in Margate in the English county of Kent, 1897

Pleasure piers were first built in Britain during the early 19th century.[2] The earliest structures were Ryde Pier, built in 1813/4, Trinity Chain Pier near Leith, built in 1821, Brighton Chain Pier, built in 1823.[2] and Margate Jetty 1823/24 originally a timber built pier.

Only the oldest of these piers still remains. At that time, the introduction of steamships and railways for the first time permitted mass tourism to dedicated seaside resorts. The large tidal ranges at many such resorts meant that passengers arriving by pleasure steamer could use a pier to disembark safely.[3] Also, for much of the day, the sea was not visible from the shore and the pleasure pier permitted holidaymakers to promenade over and alongside the sea at all times.[4] The world's longest pleasure pier is at Southend-on-Sea, Essex, and extends 1.3 miles (2.1 km) into the Thames Estuary.[2] The longest pier on the West Coast of the US is the Santa Cruz Wharf, with a length of 2,745 feet (837 m).[5]

Providing a walkway out to sea, pleasure piers often include amusements and theatres as part of their attractions.[4] Such a pier may be unroofed, closed, or partly open and partly closed. Sometimes a pier has two decks. Galveston Island Historic Pleasure Pier in Galveston, Texas has a roller coaster, 15 rides, carnival games and souvenir shops.[6]

Early pleasure piers were of complete timber construction, as was with Margate which opened in 1824. The first iron and timber built pleasure pier Margate Jetty, opened in 1855.[7] Margate pier was wrecked by a storm in January 1978 and not repaired.[8][7] The longest iron pleasure pier still remaining is the one at Southend. First opened as a wooden pier in 1829, it was reconstructed in iron and completed in 1889. In a 2006 UK poll, the public voted the seaside pier onto the list of icons of England.[9]

Fishing piers

[edit]

Many piers are built for the purpose of providing boatless anglers access to fishing grounds that are otherwise inaccessible.[10] Many "Free Piers" are available in larger harbors which differ from private piers. Free Piers are often primarily used for fishing. Fishing from a pier presents a set of different circumstances to fishing from the shore or beach, as you do not need to cast out into the deeper water. This being the case there are specific fishing rigs that have been created specifically for pier fishing[11] which allow for the direct access to deeper water.

Piers of the world

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]

In Blankenberge a first pleasure pier was built in 1894. After its destruction in the World War I, a new pier was built in 1933. It remained till the present day, but was partially transformed and modernized in 1999–2004.

In Nieuwpoort, Belgium there is a pleasure pier on both sides of the river IJzer.

Netherlands

[edit]
The Scheveningen Pier

Scheveningen, the coastal resort town of The Hague, boasts the largest pier in the Netherlands, completed in 1961. A crane, built on top of the pier's panorama tower, provides the opportunity to make a 60-metre (200 ft) high bungee jump over the North Sea waves. The present pier is a successor of an earlier pier, which was completed in 1901 but in 1943 destroyed by the German occupation forces.

United Kingdom

[edit]

England and Wales

[edit]

The first recorded pier in England was Ryde Pier, opened in 1814 on the Isle of Wight, as a landing stage to allow ferries to and from the mainland to berth. It is still used for this purpose today.[12] It also had a leisure function in the past, with the pier head once containing a pavilion, and there are still refreshment facilities today. The oldest cast iron pier in the world is Town Pier, Gravesend, in Kent, which opened in 1834. However, it is not recognised by the National Piers Society as being a seaside pier.[13]

Brighton Palace Pier (pictured in 2011), opened in 1899

Following the building of the world's first seaside pier at Ryde, the pier became fashionable at seaside resorts in England and Wales during the Victorian era, peaking in the 1860s with 22 being built in that decade.[14] A symbol of the typical British seaside holiday, by 1914, more than 100 pleasure piers were located around the UK coast.[2] Regarded as being among the finest Victorian architecture, there are still a significant number of seaside piers of architectural merit still standing, although some have been lost, including Margate, two at Brighton in East Sussex, one at New Brighton in the Wirral and three at Blackpool in Lancashire.[4] Two piers, Brighton's now derelict West Pier and Clevedon Pier, were Grade 1 listed. The Birnbeck Pier in Weston-super-Mare is the only pier in the world linked to an island. The National Piers Society gives a figure of 55 surviving seaside piers in England and Wales.[1] In 2017, Brighton Palace Pier was said to be the most visited tourist attraction outside London, with over 4.5 million visitors the previous year.[15]

See also

[edit]
  • Boardwalk
  • Breakwater
  • Dock
  • Jetty
  • List of piers
  • Seaside resort
  • Wharf

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Piers". National Piers Society. 2006. Archived from the original on September 29, 2008. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
  2. ^ a b c d "The expert selection: British seaside piers". No. 1 August 2014. Financial Times. 15 June 2015. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10.
  3. ^ Gladwell, Andrew (2015). "Introduction". London's Pleasure Steamers. Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1445641584.
  4. ^ a b c "A very British affair - the fall and rise of the seaside pier". BBC News. 16 June 2015.
  5. ^ "California Pier Statistics, Longest Piers". seecalifornia.com. Retrieved 2014-02-10.
  6. ^ Aulds, T.J. (January 28, 2012). "Landry's Corp. is close to revealing plans". News Article. Galveston Daily News. Archived from the original on January 31, 2012.
  7. ^ a b "200 years of historic British piers: in pictures". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  8. ^ "The destruction of Margate jetty in the great storm of January 1978". 13 January 2018.
  9. ^ "ICONS of England - the 100 ICONS as voted by the public". Culture 24 News. 15 June 2015.
  10. ^ "Landscape Design Book" (PDF). University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.[permanent dead link]
  11. ^ VS, Marco (2021-03-21). "Pier Fishing Rigs: 6 Common Types of Rigs for fishing from a Pier". Pro Fishing Reviews. Retrieved 2021-10-10.
  12. ^ "Britain's best seaside piers". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  13. ^ "The oldest surviving cast iron pier in the world". BBC. February 9, 2006. Retrieved March 26, 2006.
  14. ^ Dobraszczyk, Paul (2014). Iron, Ornament and Architecture in Victorian Britain: Myth and Modernity, Excess and Enchantment. Ashgate Publishing. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-472-41898-2.
  15. ^ "Brighton Palace Pier named as Britain's most visited tourist attraction outside London". Brighton and Hove News. 2 August 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2025.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Turner, K., (1999), Pier Railways and Tramways of the British Isles, The Oakwood Press, No. LP60, ISBN 0-85361-541-1.
  • Wills, Anthony; Phillips, Tim (2014). British Seaside Piers. London: English Heritage. ISBN 9781848022645.
[edit]
  • The Piers Project
  • National Piers Society
  • Details on UK Piers including Webcams

 

About Cook County

Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From 42.051159627372, -88.202951526236 to
Driving Directions From 42.092671011935, -88.097873714537 to
Driving Directions From 42.027864686476, -88.178784129852 to
Driving Directions From 42.080861469688, -88.119629346452 to
Driving Directions From 42.092626312283, -88.191267040052 to
Driving Directions From 42.102378896248, -88.203932774646 to
Driving Directions From 42.101413863629, -88.180736768318 to
Driving Directions From 42.098479365503, -88.089470502033 to
Driving Directions From 42.111332166598, -88.176665125485 to
Driving Directions From 42.124515141614, -88.154087492577 to